http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/small-particles-are-sexy-synthetic-biologists-are-sexier/ Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:18:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/small-particles-are-sexy-synthetic-biologists-are-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-25 Saints or synners? « 2020 Science Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:01:19 +0000 http://2020science.wordpress.com/?p=324#comment-25 [...] Small particles are sexy; Synthetic biologists are sexier! [...] [...] Small particles are sexy; Synthetic biologists are sexier! [...]

]]> http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/small-particles-are-sexy-synthetic-biologists-are-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-24 Maryse de la Giroday Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:21:19 +0000 http://2020science.wordpress.com/?p=324#comment-24 Hi there! I'd forgotten about the e-ink in Diamond Age (I haven't forgotten how badly Stephenson messed up the story in the last 1/3 of the book). And thanks for the info. on influential synthetic biologists. I'll try to pick up a copy of the issue (gasp! my first Esquire). Hi there! I’d forgotten about the e-ink in Diamond Age (I haven’t forgotten how badly Stephenson messed up the story in the last 1/3 of the book). And thanks for the info. on influential synthetic biologists. I’ll try to pick up a copy of the issue (gasp! my first Esquire).

]]> http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/small-particles-are-sexy-synthetic-biologists-are-sexier/comment-page-1/#comment-23 FrogHeart » Blog Archive » More about synthetic biology Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:11:25 +0000 http://2020science.wordpress.com/?p=324#comment-23 [...] has never heard of it (as per almost 90% of the US population according to the research data). Here’s more about Andrew Maynard and Esquire’s October 2008 [...] [...] has never heard of it (as per almost 90% of the US population according to the research data). Here’s more about Andrew Maynard and Esquire’s October 2008 [...]

]]>