<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synthetic biology and the public: Time for a heart to heart?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/synthetic-biology-and-the-public-time-for-a-heart-to-heart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/synthetic-biology-and-the-public-time-for-a-heart-to-heart/</link>
	<description>Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saints or synners?</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/synthetic-biology-and-the-public-time-for-a-heart-to-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Saints or synners?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.wordpress.com/?p=314#comment-171</guid>
		<description>[...] Synthetic biology and the public: Time for a heart to heart? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Synthetic biology and the public: Time for a heart to heart? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanotürkiye</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/synthetic-biology-and-the-public-time-for-a-heart-to-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>nanotürkiye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.wordpress.com/?p=314#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I think that, synthetic biology will not be accepted as nanotechnology will be. Or nanotechnology will not be used in living organisms. Because there will be a lot of people who will not want these changes in living organisms. Some will be against because of religion, some will think that new monsters will evolve.

But if we use nanotechnology in non-living organisms, there will be less opposition. Who will not want a antibacterial sock, or air conditioner, or material strenghtened with carbon nanotube? It is not a living thing, not a new creature. And this process, adding new properties to materials are done for many years, it is a common thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that, synthetic biology will not be accepted as nanotechnology will be. Or nanotechnology will not be used in living organisms. Because there will be a lot of people who will not want these changes in living organisms. Some will be against because of religion, some will think that new monsters will evolve.</p>
<p>But if we use nanotechnology in non-living organisms, there will be less opposition. Who will not want a antibacterial sock, or air conditioner, or material strenghtened with carbon nanotube? It is not a living thing, not a new creature. And this process, adding new properties to materials are done for many years, it is a common thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Maynard : Synthetic biology and the public: Time for a heart to heart?</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2008/09/30/synthetic-biology-and-the-public-time-for-a-heart-to-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard : Synthetic biology and the public: Time for a heart to heart?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.wordpress.com/?p=314#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] biology and the public: Time for a heart to heart?   From 2020science.org:So, you have a cool new science that could make a major impact on global challenges like energy, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] biology and the public: Time for a heart to heart?   From 2020science.org:So, you have a cool new science that could make a major impact on global challenges like energy, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
