<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asbestos-like nanomaterials &#8211; should we be concerned?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/</link>
	<description>Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Maynard</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-24205</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-24205</guid>
		<description>Thanks John.

There have been a few designs for fibre monitors over the years, as I&#039;m sure you are aware.  While I was working for HSE in the UK in the 1990&#039;s we were involved in the development of a device that ended up not taking off.

Whether your device (and I&#039;m beginning to wonder whether it was the forerunner of the HSE instrument) would work with nanotubes is hard to tell without further details - would love it if you could dig some up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John.</p>
<p>There have been a few designs for fibre monitors over the years, as I&#8217;m sure you are aware.  While I was working for HSE in the UK in the 1990&#8242;s we were involved in the development of a device that ended up not taking off.</p>
<p>Whether your device (and I&#8217;m beginning to wonder whether it was the forerunner of the HSE instrument) would work with nanotubes is hard to tell without further details &#8211; would love it if you could dig some up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chubb</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-24203</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-24203</guid>
		<description>In the 1970s I was involved in developing and testing a novel instrument I had devised for monitoring and size classifying airborne asbestos fibres. The impression I received at the time was that one way asbestos fibres presented a risk to health was because the size and shape enabled them to penetrate through the walls of lung membranes and cause irritation. It seems to me that the release of nanofibres into the air (in homes or workplaces) could equally present risks to health. I wonder whether this has received due consideration.

I published the work I did on the Fibre Monitor as: &quot;A novel instrument to monitor and size classify airborne fibres in the respirable size range&quot; Electrostatics &#039;91 IoP Confr Series 11 8 p169. Have far the approach would go towards working with nanofibres with the advantages from technology improvements since the mid 1970s would need proper consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1970s I was involved in developing and testing a novel instrument I had devised for monitoring and size classifying airborne asbestos fibres. The impression I received at the time was that one way asbestos fibres presented a risk to health was because the size and shape enabled them to penetrate through the walls of lung membranes and cause irritation. It seems to me that the release of nanofibres into the air (in homes or workplaces) could equally present risks to health. I wonder whether this has received due consideration.</p>
<p>I published the work I did on the Fibre Monitor as: &#8220;A novel instrument to monitor and size classify airborne fibres in the respirable size range&#8221; Electrostatics &#8217;91 IoP Confr Series 11 8 p169. Have far the approach would go towards working with nanofibres with the advantages from technology improvements since the mid 1970s would need proper consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanotechnology: From nano-novice to nano-genius in 13 steps</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-11384</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanotechnology: From nano-novice to nano-genius in 13 steps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-11384</guid>
		<description>[...] nanotubes appear to be harmful if inhaled, but the harm seems to depend on the type of nanotubes—and there are many types of carbon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nanotubes appear to be harmful if inhaled, but the harm seems to depend on the type of nanotubes—and there are many types of carbon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New carbon nanotube study raises the health impact stakes</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-2402</link>
		<dc:creator>New carbon nanotube study raises the health impact stakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-2402</guid>
		<description>[...] were raised about carbon nanotubes and their superficial similarity to asbestos fibers as far back as 1992.  Yet it wasn’t until last year that research was published suggesting carbon nanotubes that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were raised about carbon nanotubes and their superficial similarity to asbestos fibers as far back as 1992.  Yet it wasn’t until last year that research was published suggesting carbon nanotubes that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Working safely with carbon nanotubes</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>Working safely with carbon nanotubes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>[...] Asbestos-like nanomaterials - should we be concerned? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Asbestos-like nanomaterials &#8211; should we be concerned? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Herring</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Herring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>I recently finished a video for the Museum of Life and Science in Durham, NC that asks the same question: Are Carbon Nanotubes the Next Asbestos? I visited Dr. Jamie Bonner at NC State to inquire about his work on the toxicology of CNT&#039;s.

You can view the video on the Museum&#039;s website:
http://www.ncmls.org/learn-about/science-in-triangle/carbon-nanotubes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently finished a video for the Museum of Life and Science in Durham, NC that asks the same question: Are Carbon Nanotubes the Next Asbestos? I visited Dr. Jamie Bonner at NC State to inquire about his work on the toxicology of CNT&#8217;s.</p>
<p>You can view the video on the Museum&#8217;s website:<br />
<a href="http://www.ncmls.org/learn-about/science-in-triangle/carbon-nanotubes" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncmls.org/learn-about/science-in-triangle/carbon-nanotubes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A 2020 Science Taster</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>A 2020 Science Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-867</guid>
		<description>[...] Asbestos-like nanomaterials – should we be concerned? It seems that when the possible downsides of nanotechnology are broached, it doesn’t take long for the “A” word to surface.  But what is the truth—if any—behind comparisons between nanomaterials and asbestos?  From January 2009. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Asbestos-like nanomaterials – should we be concerned? It seems that when the possible downsides of nanotechnology are broached, it doesn’t take long for the “A” word to surface.  But what is the truth—if any—behind comparisons between nanomaterials and asbestos?  From January 2009. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NANOTÜRKİYE &#187; Asbest Benzeri Nanomalzemelerden Endişelenmeli Miyiz?</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/01/23/asbestos-like-nanomaterials-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>NANOTÜRKİYE &#187; Asbest Benzeri Nanomalzemelerden Endişelenmeli Miyiz?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=705#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] yazı Andrew Maynard&#8217;ın 2020 Science blogundaki &#8220;Asbestos-like nanomaterials - should we be concerned?&#8221; başlıklı yazının Türkçe çevirisidir. Çeviride hatalar bulursanız, yorum kısmında [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yazı Andrew Maynard&#8217;ın 2020 Science blogundaki &#8220;Asbestos-like nanomaterials &#8211; should we be concerned?&#8221; başlıklı yazının Türkçe çevirisidir. Çeviride hatalar bulursanız, yorum kısmında [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

