<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging the demise of science journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/</link>
	<description>Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservatories farnborough</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-143618</link>
		<dc:creator>conservatories farnborough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-143618</guid>
		<description>Possibly one of the most popular models in the UK today, the Three Facet Victorian Style conservatory is elegant in its simplicity. The conservatory is three faceted, which refers to the standard appeal of the conservatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly one of the most popular models in the UK today, the Three Facet Victorian Style conservatory is elegant in its simplicity. The conservatory is three faceted, which refers to the standard appeal of the conservatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Plants vs Zombies</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-128581</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Plants vs Zombies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 05:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-128581</guid>
		<description>Pretty good post. I just came across your blog and also wanted to state that I possess really loved reading your blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty good post. I just came across your blog and also wanted to state that I possess really loved reading your blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danijel MCfarlan</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-125258</link>
		<dc:creator>Danijel MCfarlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-125258</guid>
		<description>The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. perhaps in the future it&#039;ll do even better in those areas, but for now it&#039;s a fantastic alternative to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod&#039;s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, maybe it is your best decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. perhaps in the future it&#8217;ll do even better in those areas, but for now it&#8217;s a fantastic alternative to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod&#8217;s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, maybe it is your best decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Algerian Love Knot</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-123712</link>
		<dc:creator>Algerian Love Knot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 06:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-123712</guid>
		<description>I was just searching for this information for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your web site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that don&#039;t rank this kind of informative web sites in top of the list. Usually the top sites are full of garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just searching for this information for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your web site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that don&#8217;t rank this kind of informative web sites in top of the list. Usually the top sites are full of garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotel wesel</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-122857</link>
		<dc:creator>hotel wesel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 21:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-122857</guid>
		<description>It’s pretty interesting that the mainstream media has changed the way it looks at this recently dont you think? Now it seems that it is discussed thoroughly and more in depth. Overall though I’m looking for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s pretty interesting that the mainstream media has changed the way it looks at this recently dont you think? Now it seems that it is discussed thoroughly and more in depth. Overall though I’m looking for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2020 Science in 2009 &#8211; and a chance to win a rather nifty 2020 Science Mug!</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-47611</link>
		<dc:creator>2020 Science in 2009 &#8211; and a chance to win a rather nifty 2020 Science Mug!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-47611</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogging the demise of science journalism (March 20) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogging the demise of science journalism (March 20) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Maynard</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-43818</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-43818</guid>
		<description>Thanks - it&#039;s a while since I&#039;ve checked the comments here, and didn&#039;t catch that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; it&#8217;s a while since I&#8217;ve checked the comments here, and didn&#8217;t catch that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Skellett</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-43802</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Skellett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-43802</guid>
		<description>Hey, I think Inhecevef is a spammer (I shall be pleased? Who talks like that?) Could you delete his comment?

Interesting article btw. I see blogging as a form of science journalism, but both brands have their good points and bad points... I don&#039;t know which is better, really. I guess it depends which media outlet / blog you&#039;re talking about. Some blogs are great, and some newspapers terrible, and vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I think Inhecevef is a spammer (I shall be pleased? Who talks like that?) Could you delete his comment?</p>
<p>Interesting article btw. I see blogging as a form of science journalism, but both brands have their good points and bad points&#8230; I don&#8217;t know which is better, really. I guess it depends which media outlet / blog you&#8217;re talking about. Some blogs are great, and some newspapers terrible, and vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vrishali Subramanian</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator>Vrishali Subramanian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-1881</guid>
		<description>Andrew, you raise an important issue. My experience is that the real gems in science writing are in books- some of them are  insightful  and well written. This is in part due to the medium itself- a book allows a writer to cover more ground and be more thoughtful, which are tougher in a breaking news (sometimes), get-all-the-information-out there science journalism format. However, fewer people read books. So there is a real need to improve the quality of science journalism. And scientists like yourself who can communicate well REALLY should!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, you raise an important issue. My experience is that the real gems in science writing are in books- some of them are  insightful  and well written. This is in part due to the medium itself- a book allows a writer to cover more ground and be more thoughtful, which are tougher in a breaking news (sometimes), get-all-the-information-out there science journalism format. However, fewer people read books. So there is a real need to improve the quality of science journalism. And scientists like yourself who can communicate well REALLY should!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Maynard</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>The regurgitation of press releases is a real problem as it removes the critical filter a good journalist brings to process of communicating information.  Although interestingly (and perhaps ironically) it probably brings news outlets that follow the practice closer to the blogging community - the information being crafted by the source primarily.

Agree btw that a mix of the best would be a great thing - there are definite roles here for old and new media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The regurgitation of press releases is a real problem as it removes the critical filter a good journalist brings to process of communicating information.  Although interestingly (and perhaps ironically) it probably brings news outlets that follow the practice closer to the blogging community &#8211; the information being crafted by the source primarily.</p>
<p>Agree btw that a mix of the best would be a great thing &#8211; there are definite roles here for old and new media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Spear</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/03/20/blogging-the-demise-of-science-journalism/#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Spear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1031#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t sell yourself short on your abilities because this is a good OpEd piece worthy of the mainstream press.
But I definitely agree that as blogs rise in popularity and science journalism (not to mention the actual outlets themselves )  wanes we have a problem.
Context and relevance are key to communicating science and answering the &quot;why do I care&quot; question for the general public. A good news outlet can do that for its &#039;hometown&#039; audience which is where scientists who blog struggle sometimes. There are some killer science blogs out there and if things settle out to a mix of the best of both life will be grand.  The alternatives are far less grand.
Science journalism can come into play in the form of documentaries, radio news, or feature pieces for television but those too are becoming fewer and farther apart.
Geoff Brumfiel&#039;s piece also raises the point about journalists simply rewriting Press Release but that is a problem that crosses a lot of subject areas. Just look at the state of political reporting during recent elections. As a PR flak for a non-profit science organization and as a former journalist I honestly try to walk the line and give the media information worth using and providing interview subjects that help them do their job but I am still surprised to see something I&#039;ve written appear pretty much intact in the media. 
A PR dream, a journalist&#039;s nightmare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t sell yourself short on your abilities because this is a good OpEd piece worthy of the mainstream press.<br />
But I definitely agree that as blogs rise in popularity and science journalism (not to mention the actual outlets themselves )  wanes we have a problem.<br />
Context and relevance are key to communicating science and answering the &#8220;why do I care&#8221; question for the general public. A good news outlet can do that for its &#8216;hometown&#8217; audience which is where scientists who blog struggle sometimes. There are some killer science blogs out there and if things settle out to a mix of the best of both life will be grand.  The alternatives are far less grand.<br />
Science journalism can come into play in the form of documentaries, radio news, or feature pieces for television but those too are becoming fewer and farther apart.<br />
Geoff Brumfiel&#8217;s piece also raises the point about journalists simply rewriting Press Release but that is a problem that crosses a lot of subject areas. Just look at the state of political reporting during recent elections. As a PR flak for a non-profit science organization and as a former journalist I honestly try to walk the line and give the media information worth using and providing interview subjects that help them do their job but I am still surprised to see something I&#8217;ve written appear pretty much intact in the media.<br />
A PR dream, a journalist&#8217;s nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

