Quick poll – tweaks to the 2020 Science layout

by Andrew Maynard on May 10, 2009

[Update 5/11/09:  Thanks to everyone who voted/commented on the 2020 Science layout.  This was extremely helpful.  In the tradition of scientists the world-over, I listened to the feedback carefully... then did my own thing!  Actually, the new layout builds on the poll and comments, but I ended up sticking with the three column format.  If it doesn't work for you, or could work better - let me know!]

I’m playing around with some tweaks to the 2020 Science blog layout, and would really appreciate some feedback on which of the following iterations works better – you can tell it’s a lazy Sunday, and I have nothing better to do!

If you have a minute or two to spare, please take a look at the four layouts below, and vote for your preferred one.

And if you have any other comments or suggestions on formatting/layout that would make the site work better for you, please do let me know in the comments space.

Thanks!

Poll:

Option 1: original layout:

option-1

Option 2: two sidebars, expanded article column width:

option-2

Option 3: one sidebar:

option-3

Option 4: one sidebar, no image at the top of the sidebar:

option-4

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Related posts:

  1. 2020 Science in 2009 – and a chance to win a rather nifty 2020 Science Mug!
  2. Poll: Does trust in science need restoring?

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Dave Ferguson May 10, 2009 at 10:54 am

I’m not a fan of three-column layouts, so you see my bias already. I like #3, especially if it’s easy for you to switch the image from time to time.

Reply

2 Suzi Shapiro May 10, 2009 at 11:07 am

I like the original
Columns wide enough to be easy to read but not too wide.
Image OK if it is relevant

Reply

3 Andrew Maynard May 10, 2009 at 11:24 am

Thanks Dave and Suzi.

Having lived with the three column layout for a few months, I was getting the feeling that it was a little cluttered, with not enough emphasis on the blog text itself. Think my preferences are with #3 also at the moment, but we’ll see what others think.

Reply

4 Tim Jones May 10, 2009 at 4:24 pm

The 2-col option 3 is cleaner. I’m planning to go the same way with mine – which has organically ‘evolved’ (to be kind to myself). Also engaging with Dreamweaver for a major overhaul of my entry ‘home page’ (which most folk don’t even know exists). 2020S has a professional, focused feel. Will watch with interest.

Reply

5 Ruth Seeley May 11, 2009 at 11:36 am

Although I’d already voted, I forgot to say how hard it is to decide on design elements without seeing them side-by-side – scrolling down doesn’t quite cut it. But then I knew you’d do your own thing ultimately anyway. Because you always do. ;)

Reply

6 Andrew Maynard May 11, 2009 at 1:35 pm

Ah, but at least I listened, before doing my own thing :-) Actually, the votes and comments were very helpful, even though the top-bottom layouts were tough to compare.

Reply

Leave a Comment