Comments on: Quick poll – tweaks to the 2020 Science layout http://2020science.org/2009/05/10/quick-poll-tweaks-to-the-2020-science-layout/ Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Andrew Maynard http://2020science.org/2009/05/10/quick-poll-tweaks-to-the-2020-science-layout/#comment-9319 Andrew Maynard Mon, 11 May 2009 18:35:39 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1408#comment-9319 Ah, but at least I listened, before doing my own thing :-) Actually, the votes and comments were very helpful, even though the top-bottom layouts were tough to compare. Ah, but at least I listened, before doing my own thing :-) Actually, the votes and comments were very helpful, even though the top-bottom layouts were tough to compare.

]]> By: Ruth Seeley http://2020science.org/2009/05/10/quick-poll-tweaks-to-the-2020-science-layout/#comment-9303 Ruth Seeley Mon, 11 May 2009 16:36:56 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1408#comment-9303 Although I'd already voted, I forgot to say how hard it is to decide on design elements without seeing them side-by-side - scrolling down doesn't quite cut it. But then I knew you'd do your own thing ultimately anyway. Because you always do. ;) Although I’d already voted, I forgot to say how hard it is to decide on design elements without seeing them side-by-side – scrolling down doesn’t quite cut it. But then I knew you’d do your own thing ultimately anyway. Because you always do. ;)

]]> By: Tim Jones http://2020science.org/2009/05/10/quick-poll-tweaks-to-the-2020-science-layout/#comment-9156 Tim Jones Sun, 10 May 2009 21:24:35 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1408#comment-9156 The 2-col option 3 is cleaner. I'm planning to go the same way with mine - which has organically 'evolved' (to be kind to myself). Also engaging with Dreamweaver for a major overhaul of my entry 'home page' (which most folk don't even know exists). 2020S has a professional, focused feel. Will watch with interest. The 2-col option 3 is cleaner. I’m planning to go the same way with mine – which has organically ‘evolved’ (to be kind to myself). Also engaging with Dreamweaver for a major overhaul of my entry ‘home page’ (which most folk don’t even know exists). 2020S has a professional, focused feel. Will watch with interest.

]]> By: Andrew Maynard http://2020science.org/2009/05/10/quick-poll-tweaks-to-the-2020-science-layout/#comment-9114 Andrew Maynard Sun, 10 May 2009 16:24:15 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1408#comment-9114 Thanks Dave and Suzi. Having lived with the three column layout for a few months, I was getting the feeling that it was a little cluttered, with not enough emphasis on the blog text itself. Think my preferences are with #3 also at the moment, but we'll see what others think. Thanks Dave and Suzi.

Having lived with the three column layout for a few months, I was getting the feeling that it was a little cluttered, with not enough emphasis on the blog text itself. Think my preferences are with #3 also at the moment, but we’ll see what others think.

]]> By: Suzi Shapiro http://2020science.org/2009/05/10/quick-poll-tweaks-to-the-2020-science-layout/#comment-9113 Suzi Shapiro Sun, 10 May 2009 16:07:32 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1408#comment-9113 I like the original Columns wide enough to be easy to read but not too wide. Image OK if it is relevant I like the original
Columns wide enough to be easy to read but not too wide.
Image OK if it is relevant

]]> By: Dave Ferguson http://2020science.org/2009/05/10/quick-poll-tweaks-to-the-2020-science-layout/#comment-9110 Dave Ferguson Sun, 10 May 2009 15:54:57 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1408#comment-9110 I'm not a fan of three-column layouts, so you see my bias already. I like #3, especially if it's easy for you to switch the image from time to time. I’m not a fan of three-column layouts, so you see my bias already. I like #3, especially if it’s easy for you to switch the image from time to time.

]]>