Comments on: Wolfram Alpha – Should have called it Deep Thought! http://2020science.org/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought/ Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Walking Randomly » First impressions of Wolfram Alpha. http://2020science.org/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought/#comment-10173 Walking Randomly » First impressions of Wolfram Alpha. Sat, 16 May 2009 18:50:46 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1528#comment-10173 [...] Wolfram Alpha - Should have called it Deep Thought! - Screencast of one user’s first experiences. [...] [...] Wolfram Alpha – Should have called it Deep Thought! – Screencast of one user’s first experiences. [...]

]]> By: Tim Jones http://2020science.org/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought/#comment-10140 Tim Jones Sat, 16 May 2009 13:42:56 +0000 http://2020science.org/?p=1528#comment-10140 Very cool you captured this special moment when Wolfram Alpha was first switched on. As it failed on the key questions, I believe the protocol now is to return in a million years and try again. And in the meantime, it's a millenium of debate and pontification on the very lucrative chat show and lecture circuit for us! @physicus Very cool you captured this special moment when Wolfram Alpha was first switched on.

As it failed on the key questions, I believe the protocol now is to return in a million years and try again.

And in the meantime, it’s a millenium of debate and pontification on the very lucrative chat show and lecture circuit for us!

@physicus

]]>