One of the problems with publishing in journals like Nature is that it can get a little pricey for people to read your work if they (or their organization) don’t subscribe. For instance, if you want to read the commentary I’ve just had published on defining engineered nanomaterials for regulatory purposes, you are facing a hefty $32 fee to push through the paywall. Now I know that I write interesting stuff. But I’m not sure it’s that interesting!
Which is why I have just posted an earlier draft of the piece over on the Risk Science Blog.
This isn’t as focused or specific as the published commentary. But it gives a rough idea of where I’m coming from.
And just because I can, I have also posted link to a later draft, and some notes on the editing process – so that those of you with more time than sense can study in depth the evolution of the piece from initial scribblings to final product!
The early draft can be read here, and the published commentary “Don’t define nanomaterials” (Nature 475, 31 2011) can be accessed here.
Related posts:
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Nice post there. Its right that some interesting post or articles may remain unreadable for a common man because of its expenses.
{ 1 trackback }