<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>2020 Science &#187; Gray goo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2020science.org/tag/gray-goo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2020science.org</link>
	<description>Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nanotechnology in motion: the good, the bad and the.. just plain weird?</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/04/25/nanotechnology-in-motion-the-good-the-bad-and-the-weird/</link>
		<comments>http://2020science.org/2009/04/25/nanotechnology-in-motion-the-good-the-bad-and-the-weird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray goo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanobots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many good nanotech videos have you come across?  Chances are, you&#8217;ll be struggling to name more than one of two.  But over the past few weeks there have been a few posted on the web that are worth watching.  These three in particular mesh together rather nicely to tell a story of nanotechnology&#8217;s potential, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2F2020science.org%2F2009%2F04%2F25%2Fnanotechnology-in-motion-the-good-the-bad-and-the-weird%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2F2020science.org%2F2009%2F04%2F25%2Fnanotechnology-in-motion-the-good-the-bad-and-the-weird%2F&amp;source=2020science&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span class="drop_cap">H</span>ow many good nanotech videos have you come across?  Chances are, you&#8217;ll be struggling to name more than one of two.  But over the past few weeks there have been a few posted on the web that are worth watching.  These three in particular mesh together rather nicely to tell a story of nanotechnology&#8217;s potential, some of the hurdles that need to be overcome to make it work, and one or two of the myths that have messed around with people&#8217;s perceptions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The first two feature footage of me in conversation with Jorge Ribas at the <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/technology/wide-angle/nanotech-cancer.html" target="_blank">Discovery Channel</a>, but don&#8217;t let that put you off &#8211; Jorge did a fantastic job of editing the conversation into something worth watching.  The third is a deliciously wicked cartoon from <a href="http://www.ransomriggs.com/" target="_blank">Ransom Riggs </a>that has already done the Web circuit, but is well worth airing again.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>THE GOOD STUFF<br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>A glimpse into some of the cool stuff that could come about through engineering matter at a nanometer scale:</em></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="600" height="362" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yYXWHVZU0_g&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="362" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yYXWHVZU0_g&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>THE &#8220;BAD&#8221; STUFF<br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Actually, this isn&#8217;t bad at all, but video does give a glimpse into some of the challenges we face if nanotechnology is to reach it&#8217;s potential without causing unnecessary harm:</em></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="600" height="362" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qc0KLV8CW08&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="362" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qc0KLV8CW08&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>AND THE WEIRD STUFF<br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>I thought this cartoon from Ransom Riggs was a great foil to the first two videos, as it lampoons one of the persistent myths of nanotechnology &#8211; the idea of a &#8220;gray goo&#8221; of self-replicating nanobots destroying the world.  Crazy as the idea sounds, it was Prince Charles&#8217; concerns over gray goo that led to the <a href="http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm" target="_blank">UK Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering</a> publishing what is still one of the most authoritative assessments of nanotechnology benefits and risks. </em></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="600" height="362" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_0dYPnui3rM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="362" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_0dYPnui3rM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">All in all, a great introduction to the promise, hurdles and outright myths of nanotechnology.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If you have other favorite nanotech videos, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2020science.org/2009/04/25/nanotechnology-in-motion-the-good-the-bad-and-the-weird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
