<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>2020 Science &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2020science.org/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2020science.org</link>
	<description>Providing a clear perspective on developing science and technology responsibly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wolfram Alpha &#8211; Should have called it Deep Thought!</title>
		<link>http://2020science.org/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://2020science.org/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 11:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolfram Alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2020science.org/?p=1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night, Stephen Wolfram threw the switch on Wolfram Alpha &#8211; a ground-breaking&#8230; no, make that game changing&#8230; &#8220;search engine&#8221; that computes answers to questions rather than simply drowning you in a torrent of possibly-relevant web pages.  Itching to give it a whirl, I asked some of my friends on Twitter to suggest some questions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2F2020science.org%2F2009%2F05%2F16%2Fwolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2F2020science.org%2F2009%2F05%2F16%2Fwolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought%2F&amp;source=2020science&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span class="drop_cap">L</span>ast night, Stephen Wolfram threw the switch on <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/" target="_blank">Wolfram Alpha</a> &#8211; a ground-breaking&#8230; no, make that <em>game changing</em>&#8230; &#8220;search engine&#8221; that computes answers to questions rather than simply drowning you in a torrent of possibly-relevant web pages.  Itching to give it a whirl, I asked some of my friends on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/2020science" target="_blank">Twitter</a> to suggest some questions to ask it.</p>
<p>This is the screencast of what happened (press <em>play</em> to start):<span id="more-1528"></span></p>
<p><img src="" /></p>
<p>Mmm, maybe now we&#8217;ve got the ultimate answer-machine, we need to work on the ultimate questions a little more&#8230;</p>
<p>Frivolity aside, this is a stupendous achievement.  OK so it doesn&#8217;t handle nonsense questions that well (although all credit to the Alpha team that it at least handles some of the more &#8220;important&#8221; ones!) and it needs a crash course in &#8220;love.&#8221; But what it does do is cut through the digital dross and begin to make sense of the mountains of information data buried in the web.  And I suspect that this is just the beginning.</p>
<p>Congratulations Wolfram &#8211; you could have just ushered in the next phase in the evolution of the Web!</p>
<p><em>Many thanks to everyone on Twitter who sent me questions &#8211; especially <a href="http://twitter.com/Kulinowski" target="_blank">@kulinowski</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/chronsciguy" target="_blank">@chronsciguy</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/eronarn" target="_blank">@eronarn</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/silentypewriter" target="_blank">@silentypewriter</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/physicus" target="_blank">@physicus</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/crc8" target="_blank">@crc8</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/quinw" target="_blank">@quinw</a></em></p>
<p><em>And a quick note to @physicus &#8211; Alpha may struggle with the problem of dispatching small rodents, but Stephen Wolfram&#8217;s<a href="http://www.wolframscience.com/" target="_blank"> </a></em><a href="http://www.wolframscience.com/" target="_blank">New Kind of Science</a><em> works a treat!<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2020science.org/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-should-have-called-it-deep-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
